评语：MacBook Air 15 因 M5 和 Wi-Fi 7 而变得更出色全新的Apple M5 SoC 功能强大，效率极高，与 MacBook Air 15 的被动散热系统完美匹配。在 Windows 领域，无论是 x86 芯片还是高通公司的 ARM CPU，都无法与之媲美。M5 的性能令人惊叹，在游戏中也非常高效，我们没有遇到任何节流现象。这意味着，即使是要求苛刻的游戏，如《赛博朋克 2077》或《博德之门 3》，这款轻薄、静音的 MacBook Air 也能流畅播放，而且不会降低细节。
Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG
Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG
Test device courtesy of Apple Deutschland
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
其他改进还包括 Wi-Fi 以及更快的 PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘，起价 1299 美元的基本型号也是如此。由于升级了内存和存储设备，我们的评测机型价格不菲，但基本机型的性能基本相同，这也是我们向大多数用户推荐的机型。
MacBook Air 的不足之处依然存在，如内存和存储空间焊接、缺少 Face-ID 和有限的端口数量，这在较大的 15 英寸机型上更加令人讨厌。我们并不在意 Air 上的 IPS 屏幕，因为它没有 PWM 问题，而且画质不错，但 60 Hz 的刷新率在 2026 年已经非常过时了。考虑到入门级的 MacBook Pro 14然而，我们认为Apple 并不想为 Air 提供更好的屏幕，而是希望你换成 Pro，以获得更好的屏幕。
Pros+ 最快的单核处理器
+ 无风扇散热
+ 游戏时无节流
+ 出色的 IPS 屏幕
+ 雷电 4、Wi-Fi 7 和 BT 6
+ 高品质铝制机身
+ 电池续航时间长
+ 出色的扬声器Cons- 几乎无需维护（ram 和 ssd 已焊接）
- 60 赫兹
- 仅 1 年保修
- 网络摄像头无 Face-ID，照片/视频分辨率低
价格和供应情况你可以从亚马逊订购新款 MacBook Air 15 M5，起价为 1299 美元。
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types ← exclude selected tags
Table of Contents评语：MacBook Air 15 因 M5 和 Wi-Fi 7 而变得更出色规格外壳和连接显示屏 - 60 Hz IPS，无 PWM性能 -Apple M5，10 核 GPU排放与功耗笔记本检查评级潜在竞争对手比较
Apple 新款 MacBook Air 配备了速度更快的 M5 SoC，拥有 10 个 GPU 内核。制造商还升级了 Wi-Fi 模块和固态硬盘的速度，你可以以 1299 美元的价格买到配备 16GB 内存和 512GB 固态硬盘存储空间的基本机型，而我们的评测机则有一些升级（32GB 内存和 2TB 存储空间），因此标价提高到 2299 美元。
规格
Apple MacBook Air 15 M5ProcessorApple M5 10-Core 10c/10t, 4 x 4.6 GHz Apple M5 S-Core, 6 x 3.0 GHz Apple M5 E-Core, 23 W PL2 / Short Burst, 11 W PL1 / Sustained, MDE44Graphics adapterApple M5 10-Core GPU, 17 W TDPMemory32 GB , LPDDR5x-9600, onboardDisplay15.30 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1864 pixel 224 PPI, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 HzStorageApple SSD AP2048Z, 2048 GB , 1986 GB freeConnections2 USB4 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt 4, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm stereo, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness SensorNetworkingWi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 11.5 x 340.4 x 237.6Battery66.5 Wh Lithium-PolymerOperating SystemApple macOS 26 TahoeCameraWebcam: 12 MP Center StagePrimary Camera: 12 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: six speaker sound system, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 35W PSU, 12 Months Warranty, fanlessWeight1.512 kg, Power Supply: 186 gLinksApple homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和连接包括端口、网络摄像头和输入设备在内的外壳设计与上一代 M4 机型相比没有变化 之前的 M4 型号因此，这款笔记本电脑依然非常轻薄，重量仅为 1.512 千克。Apple 升级了 Wi-Fi 模块，现在它支持最新的 Wi-Fi 7 标准，包括蓝牙 6.0。在我们的测试中，传输速率良好且稳定，与较小的 MacBook Air 13 M5.以下图片来自上一代 M4。
尺寸比较
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite DIN A4 ❌
左：MagSafe、2x USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 4（40 Gbps）、DisplayPort 1.4、Power Delivery右：3.5 毫米立体声插孔
NetworkingApple MacBook Air 15 M5Wi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1794 (min: 1717) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1827 (min: 1707) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1762 (min: 1689) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1618 (min: 1588) MBit/s ∼89%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeIntel BE201 320MHz iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1640 (min: 1449) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1562 (min: 1469) MBit/s ∼85%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel BE201 320MHz iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1656 (min: 1540) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1568 (min: 1525) MBit/s ∼86%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1243 (min: 1139) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1602 (min: 1438) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1029 (min: 963) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1656 (min: 836) MBit/s ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm FastConnect 7800 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1588 (min: 1549) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1749 (min: 1685) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1606 (min: 1582) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1669 (min: 1569) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M5; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1794 (1717-1853) MBit/sApple MacBook Air 15 M5; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1827 (1707-1891) MBit/s
19.8 ∆E10.5 ∆E14.6 ∆E17.1 ∆E12.2 ∆E8.9 ∆E8.9 ∆E13.6 ∆E13.1 ∆E13.1 ∆E8.5 ∆E6.4 ∆E8.8 ∆E10.8 ∆E17.2 ∆E5.2 ∆E13.6 ∆E14.4 ∆E2.6 ∆E4.8 ∆E11.9 ∆E16 ∆E19.5 ∆E5.4 ∆EColorChecker Apple MacBook Air 15 M5: 11.53 ∆E min: 2.61 - max: 19.81 ∆E
Apple MacBook Air 15 M5
可持续性Apple 提供全面的环境报告包括有关二氧化碳排放量和可回收内容的数据。下图显示了 MacBook Air 15 的示例数据，配备 24GB 内存和 1TB SSD 存储器的最高型号的碳足迹为 167 千克CO2e。
ⓘ Apple环境数据 MacBook Air 15 M5 基本型显示屏 - 60 Hz IPS，无 PWM子像素阵列几乎没有背光出血Apple 由于没有改变显示屏，因此我们仍然可以获得一块 60 Hz 的 IPS 屏幕（2560 x 1664 像素，16:10），并提供良好的图像质量，但低频是一个问题。屏幕表面具有防反射功能，与其他大多数亮面屏幕相比具有明显的优势，这一点在下面的户外拍摄中也很明显。几乎没有背光出血现象，也没有 PWM 闪烁，同时响应时间也不明显。亮度和色温都可以自动调节。
亮度仍在 500 尼特以内，但黑色值稍高，为 0.44，最大对比度约为 1300:1。我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析后发现，出厂时的校准效果并不理想，在色温偏冷的情况下会出现明显的偏蓝现象。这提升了最大亮度，在使用 True Tone 时并不明显，但对于图片编辑来说并不理想。我们对面板进行了校准，明显提高了精确度（可在下面的框中免费下载相应的配置文件），因此图片编辑不成问题（P3 和 sRGB）。
511cd/m²522cd/m²521cd/m²534cd/m²538cd/m²516cd/m²523cd/m²537cd/m²486cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 538 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 520.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 90 %Center on Battery: 538 cd/m²Contrast: 1223:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}calibrated: 0.7ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}86.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)98.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D)97.5% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.19CCT: 7075 KDownload ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M5IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3", 60 HzApple MacBook Air 15 M4IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3", 60 HzMicrosoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeLQ150P1JX61, IPS, 2496x1664, 15", 120 HzLenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionATNA53JB01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 HzMicrosoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteSharp LQ150P1JX61, IPS, 2496x1664, 15", 120 HzSamsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 HzDisplay2%1%5%6% Display P3 Coverage (%)97.598.7 1%98.1 1%100 3%99.5 2% sRGB Coverage (%)98.3100 2%100 2%100 2%100 2% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)86.388.3 2%87.2 1%94.6 10%97.5 13%Response Times11%-8%96%-78%97% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)26.9 ?(13.4, 13.5)23.2 ?(10.5, 12.7) 14%33.4 ?(12.5, 20.9) -24%1.46 ?(0.7, 0.76) 95%44.4 ?(21.3, 23.1) -65%0.64 ?(0.33, 0.31) 98% Response Time Black / White * (ms)15.9 ?(4.9, 11)14.7 ?(4.6, 10.1) 8%14.7 ?(5.5, 9.2) 8%0.44 ?(0.24, 0.2) 97%30.3 ?(15.9, 14.4) -91%0.68 ?(0.38, 0.3) 96% PWM Frequency (Hz)1200 ?(77)240 ?(100) PWM Amplitude * (%)2250Screen11%37%538%29%19%Brightness middle (cd/m²)538525 -2%599 11%509 -5%579.9 8%385 -28%Brightness (cd/m²)521513 -2%590 13%508 -2%576 11%391 -25%Brightness Distribution (%)9087 -3%93 3%97 8%92 2%97 8%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.440.32 27%0.4 9%0.01 98%0.34 23%Contrast (:1)12231641 34%1498 22%50900 4062%1706 39%Colorchecker dE 2000 *2.11.7 19%0.5 76%1.1 48%0.96 54%1.1 48%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *4.14 2%0.9 78%2.5 39%2.39 42%1.8 56%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *0.7Greyscale dE 2000 *3.12.7 13%0.6 81%1.5 52%1.4 55%1.4 55%Gamma2.19 100%2.2 100%2.16 102%2.28 96%2.13 103%2.24 98%CCT7075 92%7010 93%6543 99%6294 103%6407 101%6444 101%Total Average (Program / Settings)8% /
9%10% /
22%213% /
347%-25% /
8%41% /
30%* ... smaller is better
卡尔曼灰度CalMAN 饱和度卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 灰度校准CalMAN 饱和度校准CalMAN 饱和度校准
对比 sRGB对 P3对比 AdobeRGB
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White15.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.9 ms rise↘ 11 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey26.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.4 ms rise↘ 13.5 ms fallThe screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7816 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
在阳光下
视角性能 -Apple M5，10 核 GPU
处理器新款Apple M5（4 个超级内核、6 个效率内核）的 CPU 性能非常惊人，是目前能买到的最快的单核处理器，而且速度还相当快。多核性能也非常出色，尽管系统必须很快降低功耗限制。在耗时几分钟的 Cinebench 2024 Multi 测试中，与配备主动散热系统的 MacBook Pro 14 M5 相比，差距仍然只有 18%。在 CB24 Multi 压力测试（30 分钟）后，结果仍然只低 10%。
在所有 CPU 基准测试中，新款 M5 机型比 MacBook Air 15 M4 快 14%。 MacBook Air 15 M4快 14%，与 MacBook Air 15 M3.CPU 性能不会因电池电量不足而降低。
CPU Performance rating: Percent Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core CPU Performance rating
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple M5 10-Core
100 pt Average Apple M5 10-Core
95.3 pt Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core
93.2 pt Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-Core
82 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
69.8 pt Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3
65.3 pt Average of class Subnotebook
63.3 pt Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
61.4 pt Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeIntel Core Ultra 7 268V
60.4 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Core Ultra 7 258V
58.6 pt Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GBApple M2
55 pt Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple M5 10-Core
1172 Points +22%Average Apple M5 10-Core (957 - 1172, n=3)
1030 Points +7%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core
962 Points Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
926 Points -4%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-Core
874 Points -9%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
857 Points -11%Average of class Subnotebook (148 - 1471, n=71, last 2 years)
729 Points -24%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeIntel Core Ultra 7 268V
600 Points -38%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3
598 Points -38%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Core Ultra 7 258V
574 Points -40%Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GBApple M2
513 Points -47%Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple M5 10-Core
200 Points +1%Average Apple M5 10-Core (199 - 200, n=3)
199.7 Points 0%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core
199 Points Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-Core
173 Points -13%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3
142 Points -29%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeIntel Core Ultra 7 268V
123.3 Points -38%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
123 Points -38%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
123 Points -38%Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GBApple M2
121 Points -39%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Core Ultra 7 258V
119.7 Points -40%Average of class Subnotebook (35 - 200, n=57, last 2 years)
118.6 Points -40%Geekbench 6.6 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple M5 10-Core
18054 Points +6%Average Apple M5 10-Core (16544 - 18054, n=5)
17314 Points +2%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core
16995 Points Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-Core
14901 Points -12%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
14646 Points -14%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
14220 Points -16%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
7596 Points -55%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
7596 Points -55%Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 20325, n=69, last 2 years)
12348 Points -27%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3
12066 Points -29%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeIntel Core Ultra 7 268V
11279 Points -34%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Core Ultra 7 258V
11037 Points -35%Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GBApple M2
10093 Points -41%Geekbench 6.6 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple M5 10-Core
4326 Points +3%Average Apple M5 10-Core (4128 - 4326, n=5)
4228 Points +1%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core
4195 Points Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-Core
3655 Points -13%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3
3130 Points -25%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeIntel Core Ultra 7 268V
2871 Points -32%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
2812 Points -33%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
1896 Points -55%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
1896 Points -55%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Core Ultra 7 258V
2795 Points -33%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
2751 Points -34%Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 4195, n=65, last 2 years)
2745 Points -35%Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GBApple M2
2593 Points -38%
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core199 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core962 Points
Cinebench 2026 CPU Multi3692 Points
Cinebench 2026 CPU Single Thread732 Points
Help... in comparisonCinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparisonAsus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min)
N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs91 ...Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M959Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU960Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM i9-13900H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU962Apple MacBook Air 15 M5
M5 10-Core, M5 10-Core GPU962Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 Ryzen 7 255, Radeon 780M962Geekom A8, R9 8945HS R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M967Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 Ultra 5 338H, Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU968 ...
(max)
TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation5372
系统性能Apple 还比 M4 增加了内存带宽。总的来说，在日常使用中，你不会发现与更昂贵的 MacBook Pro 机型或更实惠的 MacBook Air 15 M5 基本机型相比有什么不同。
记忆标记 MBA 15 M5记忆标记 MBA 15 M4
Performance rating: Percent CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness WebXPRT 3: Overall WebXPRT 4: Overall Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total Performance rating
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5M5 10-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
93.2 pt Apple MacBook Air 15 M5M5 10-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z
90.7 pt Average Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU
88.9 pt Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
78.7 pt Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
60.5 pt Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 268V, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB
60.4 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
60 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01
59.4 pt Average of class Subnotebook
58.4 pt CrossMark / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5M5 10-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
2426 Points +3%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5M5 10-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z
2356 Points Average Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU (2129 - 2426, n=3)
2304 Points -2%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1978 Points -16%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
1742 Points -26%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 268V, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB
1738 Points -26%Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2356, n=63, last 2 years)
1627 Points -31%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
1385 Points -41%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01
1384 Points -41%CrossMark / Productivity
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5M5 10-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
2344 Points +3%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5M5 10-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z
2277 Points Average Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU (2036 - 2344, n=3)
2219 Points -3%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1871 Points -18%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
1684 Points -26%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 268V, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB
1680 Points -26%Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 2277, n=63, last 2 years)
1547 Points -32%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
1303 Points -43%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01
1293 Points -43%CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5M5 10-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
2820 Points +3%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5M5 10-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z
2743 Points Average Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU (2620 - 2820, n=3)
2728 Points -1%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
2298 Points -16%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
1977 Points -28%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 268V, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB
1976 Points -28%Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2743, n=63, last 2 years)
1831 Points -33%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01
1537 Points -44%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
1496 Points -45%CrossMark / Responsiveness
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5M5 10-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1712 Points +3%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5M5 10-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1657 Points Average Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU (1307 - 1712, n=3)
1559 Points -6%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1490 Points -10%Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1854, n=63, last 2 years)
1341 Points -19%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
1322 Points -20%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
1320 Points -20%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 268V, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB
1311 Points -21%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01
1237 Points -25%WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5M5 10-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
540 Points +2%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5M5 10-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z
530 Points Average Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU (480 - 540, n=3)
517 Points -2%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
479 Points -10%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01
454 Points -14%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
444 Points -16%Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 530, n=59, last 2 years)
331 Points -38%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 268V, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB
310 Points -42%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
291 Points -45%WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5M5 10-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
384 Points +2%Average Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU (376 - 384, n=3)
379 Points 0%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5M5 10-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z
378 Points Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
348 Points -8%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
313 Points -17%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01
311 Points -18%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 268V, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB
287 Points -24%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
281 Points -26%Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 378, n=64, last 2 years)
273 Points -28%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Subnotebook (234 - 1104, n=64, last 2 years)
479 ms * -101%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 268V, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB
475 ms * -99%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
471 ms * -97%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01
422.3 ms * -77%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteAdreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
399.4 ms * -67%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
278.4 ms * -17%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5M5 10-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z
238.6 ms * Average Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU (228 - 243, n=3)
236 ms * +1%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5M5 10-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z
227.9 ms * +4%* ... smaller is better
存储设备现在，基本机型默认配备 512GB SSD 存储，速度提升至 PCIe 4.0，因此传输速率与 MacBook Pro 机型相当，约为 7 GB/s。我们的评测机配备的是 2 TB 硬盘，升级价格不菲（600 美元）。固态硬盘芯片再次采用焊接方式，但 M5 代的最大容量从 2 TB 提高到了 4 TB。
磁盘标记 MBA 15 M5磁盘标记 MBA 15 M4
Drive Performance rating | Blackmagic Disk Speed Test Drive Performance rating - Percent
Apple MacBook Air 13 M5Apple SSD AP0512Z
97.9 pt Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple SSD AP1024Z
97.2 pt Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple SSD AP2048Z
96.1 pt Average Apple SSD AP2048Z
90.7 pt Average of class Subnotebook
59.7 pt Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4Apple SSD AP0512Z
48.5 pt Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple SSD AP0512Z
46.4 pt Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple SSD AP1024Z
44.6 pt Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
5GB ReadApple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple SSD AP1024Z
6752.1 MB/s +7%Apple MacBook Air 13 M5Apple SSD AP0512Z
6473.4 MB/s +3%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple SSD AP2048Z
6312.2 MB/s Average Apple SSD AP2048Z (5294 - 6312, n=7)
5501 MB/s -13%Average of class Subnotebook (1592 - 6473, n=5, last 2 years)
4023 MB/s -36%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4Apple SSD AP0512Z
3028 MB/s -52%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple SSD AP0512Z
2947.8 MB/s -53%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple SSD AP1024Z
2904 MB/s -54% 5GB WriteApple MacBook Air 13 M5Apple SSD AP0512Z
6558.6 MB/s +1%Average Apple SSD AP2048Z (6314 - 6713, n=7)
6558 MB/s +1%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple SSD AP2048Z
6475.1 MB/s Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple SSD AP1024Z
6194.2 MB/s -4%Average of class Subnotebook (1541 - 6559, n=5, last 2 years)
3917 MB/s -40%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4Apple SSD AP0512Z
3426 MB/s -47%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple SSD AP0512Z
3217.8 MB/s -50%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple SSD AP1024Z
3023.9 MB/s -53%
图形处理器性能MacBook Air 15 配备了速度更快的 M5 SoC 和 10 核 GPU与 MacBook Pro 14 M5 一样。它在短期基准测试中的表现非常出色，我们只看到了最多 5% 的差距，而与之前的 MacBook Air 15 M4 相比，至少有 30% 的优势。不过，性能并不稳定，在 3DMark 压力测试（Steel Nomad Light）中会下降约 23%。
而游戏性能则完全稳定，因为 SoC 的功耗本来就不高（在《赛博朋克 2077》、《刺客信条暗影》或《博德之门 3》等游戏中约为 8 瓦）。我们已经在较小的 MacBook Air 13 M5其结果是，即使在较长的游戏时间内，游戏性能也完全稳定。如果减少细节，Air M5 甚至可以在完全静音的情况下处理这些要求苛刻的游戏，而不会出现节流现象。
3DMark | Cinebench 2024 | Geekbench 6.6 3DMark
Steel Nomad ScoreApple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple M5 10-Core GPU, Apple M5 10-Core
1125 Points +5%Average Apple M5 10-Core GPU (1070 - 1125, n=2)
1098 Points +3%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core GPU, Apple M5 10-Core
1070 Points Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
910 Points -15%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
808 Points -24%Average of class Subnotebook (184 - 1095, n=31, last 2 years)
564 Points -47%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
534 Points -50% Steel Nomad Light ScoreApple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple M5 10-Core GPU, Apple M5 10-Core
5221 Points +3%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core GPU, Apple M5 10-Core
5084 Points Average Apple M5 10-Core GPU (4286 - 5221, n=3)
4864 Points -4%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 10-Core
3839 Points -24%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
3555 Points -30%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
3227 Points -37%Average of class Subnotebook (1034 - 5084, n=27, last 2 years)
2754 Points -46%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
2189 Points -57% Wild Life ExtremeApple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple M5 10-Core GPU, Apple M5 10-Core
12059 Points +5%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core GPU, Apple M5 10-Core
11498 Points Average Apple M5 10-Core GPU (9391 - 12059, n=3)
10983 Points -4%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 10-Core
8735 Points -24%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
7931 Points -31%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
7331 Points -36%Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GBApple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
6804 Points -41%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
6546 Points -43%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
6303 Points -45%Average of class Subnotebook (659 - 11498, n=33, last 2 years)
6029 Points -48%Cinebench 2024 - GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple M5 10-Core GPU, Apple M5 10-Core
6139 Points +1%Average Apple M5 10-Core GPU (6071 - 6139, n=2)
6105 Points +1%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core GPU, Apple M5 10-Core
6071 Points Average of class Subnotebook (3574 - 6071, n=4, last 2 years)
4739 Points -22%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 10-Core
3897 Points -36%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
3380 Points -44%Geekbench 6.6
GPU MetalApple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple M5 10-Core GPU, Apple M5 10-Core
77007 Points +1%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core GPU, Apple M5 10-Core
76530 Points Average Apple M5 10-Core GPU (74568 - 77007, n=4)
75932 Points -1%Average of class Subnotebook (31469 - 76530, n=5, last 2 years)
55566 Points -27%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 10-Core
54887 Points -28%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
47699 Points -38%Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GBApple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
45460 Points -41% GPU OpenCLApple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple M5 10-Core GPU, Apple M5 10-Core
48756 Points +2%Average Apple M5 10-Core GPU (47755 - 48756, n=2)
48256 Points +1%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core GPU, Apple M5 10-Core
47755 Points Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 10-Core
36135 Points -24%Average of class Subnotebook (9487 - 206281, n=63, last 2 years)
31024 Points -35%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
30470 Points -36%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
30317 Points -37%Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GBApple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
27920 Points -42%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
27248 Points -43%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
20783 Points -56%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
20104 Points -58%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
15316 Points -68%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
15316 Points -68%
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
1070 points3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
5084 pointsHelp
Blender: v3.3 Classroom METAL | v3.3 Classroom CPU Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GBApple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
237 Seconds * -211%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
129 Seconds * -69%Average of class Subnotebook (76.3 - 227, n=5, last 2 years)
121.9 Seconds * -60%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 10-Core
103 Seconds * -35%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core GPU, Apple M5 10-Core
76.3 Seconds * Average Apple M5 10-Core GPU (68 - 76.3, n=2)
72.2 Seconds * +5%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple M5 10-Core GPU, Apple M5 10-Core
68 Seconds * +11%Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GBApple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
594 Seconds * -73%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
593 Seconds * -72%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
584 Seconds * -70%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
555 Seconds * -61%Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 861, n=63, last 2 years)
525 Seconds * -53%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
491 Seconds * -43%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple M5 10-Core GPU, Apple M5 10-Core
429 Seconds * -25%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 10-Core
405 Seconds * -18%Average Apple M5 10-Core GPU (344 - 429, n=2)
387 Seconds * -13%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core GPU, Apple M5 10-Core
344 Seconds * * ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | Assassin's Creed Shadows | Total War Pharaoh | Shadow of the Tomb Raider Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeIntel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
29.6 (25min) fps +27%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU
29.3 fps +26%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
28.2 (23.1min) fps +21%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
26.9 (22.4min, 21.6P1) fps +15%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU
23.3 fps Average of class Subnotebook (5.6 - 44.9, n=65, last 2 years)
20.6 fps -12%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-Core, Apple M4 10-core GPU
18 fps -23%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
14.9 (11.6min) fps -36%Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU
47 fps +19%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU
39.4 fps Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-Core, Apple M4 10-core GPU
27.9 fps -29%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeIntel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
27.4 fps -30%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
25.5 fps -35%Average of class Subnotebook (10.2 - 53.5, n=58, last 2 years)
23.4 fps -41%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
19 fps -52%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
17.4 fps -56%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
17.1 fps -57%Assassin's Creed Shadows - 1920x1080 Low
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU
32 fps +23%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU
26 fps Average of class Subnotebook (17 - 26, n=5, last 2 years)
22 fps -15%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
20 (4min, 11P0.1, 15P1) fps -23%Total War Pharaoh - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU
49 fps +3%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU
47.5 fps Average of class Subnotebook (14.9 - 71.1, n=9, last 2 years)
36.4 fps -23%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-Core, Apple M4 10-core GPU
35.2 fps -26%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
35 fps -26%Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU
59 fps +40%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU
42 fps Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
37 (23min) fps -12%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-Core, Apple M4 10-core GPU
34 fps -19%Average of class Subnotebook (17 - 42, n=6, last 2 years)
33.5 fps -20%Apple MacBook Air 15 M3Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
32 fps -24%Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GBApple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
23 fps -45%
lowmed.highultraShadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)
99
54
48
42
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)
60.3
49.8
41
39.4
Cyberpunk 2077 (2023)
42.6
32.5
27.1
23.3
Total War Pharaoh (2023)
50.9
47.5
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025)
26
23
20
13
排放与功耗系统噪音MacBook Air 仍然使用无风扇散热装置，因此笔记本电脑始终保持静音，我们也没有感受到任何其他电子噪音。与 Windows 竞争对手相比，这是一个巨大的优势。
Apple MacBook Air 15 M5M5 10-Core, M5 10-Core GPUMicrosoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeCore Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140VLenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionCore Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140VMicrosoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteSD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSSamsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSNoiseoff / environment * (dB)23.924.423.324.6Idle Minimum * (dB)23.924.423.324.6Idle Average * (dB)23.924.423.324.6Idle Maximum * (dB)23.924.423.324.6Load Average * (dB)31.835.825.728.1Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)3839.431.132.4Load Maximum * (dB)41.94533.232.4* ... smaller is better
温度表面温度绝对没有问题，MacBook Air 通常会保持非常凉爽。如果压力很大，温度会略高于 40 °C，但这不成问题。在 CPU/GPU 综合负载的压力测试中，M5 SoC 的功耗高达 28 瓦，约 20 分钟后迅速降至 9 瓦左右。
Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
41.7 °C44.1 °C39.3 °C 38.1 °C39.3 °C35 °C 33.3 °C30 °C31.8 °C
Maximum: 44.1 °CAverage: 37 °C
39.3 °C43.1 °C41.9 °C38 °C40.9 °C39.1 °C32 °C33.3 °C33.4 °C
Maximum: 43.1 °CAverage: 37.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 41.1 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
24 °C24 °C23.8 °C 23.8 °C23.8 °C23.6 °C 23.6 °C23.5 °C23.5 °C
Maximum: 24 °CAverage: 23.7 °C
23.9 °C23.7 °C23.6 °C23.6 °C23.8 °C23.6 °C23.6 °C23.5 °C23.4 °C
Maximum: 23.9 °CAverage: 23.6 °C Power Supply (max.) 26.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk
41.7 °C44.3 °C39.1 °C 38.2 °C38 °C34.9 °C 32.7 °C29.1 °C31 °C
Maximum: 44.3 °CAverage: 36.6 °C
39.6 °C42.8 °C41.6 °C36.7 °C41.7 °C38.6 °C31.8 °C33 °C32.7 °C
Maximum: 42.8 °CAverage: 37.6 °C Power Supply (max.) 41.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.3 °C / 91.9 F) and are therefore not hot. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-5.1 °C / -9.1 F).
热图压力（顶部）热图压力（底部）
Apple MacBook Air 15 M5M5 10-Core, M5 10-Core GPUApple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core, M4 10-Core GPUMicrosoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeCore Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140VLenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionCore Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140VMicrosoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteSD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSSamsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSHeat0%0%2%7%-8%Maximum Upper Side * (°C)44.144.9 -2%45.7 -4%42.1 5%45.4 -3%44.3 -0%Maximum Bottom * (°C)43.143.9 -2%42.9 -0%39.5 8%37.2 14%51.6 -20%Idle Upper Side * (°C)2423.4 2%23.6 2%24.5 -2%22.4 7%25.1 -5%Idle Bottom * (°C)23.923.5 2%23.1 3%24.4 -2%22 8%25.8 -8%* ... smaller is better
Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 M5 10-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø5.13 (4.424-12.356) WattApple MacBook Air 15 M4 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø4 (3.391-14.396) WattApple MacBook Air 15 M5 M5 10-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP2048Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø5.34 (4.55-15.515) WattApple MacBook Air 15 M4 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 10-Core, Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø5.15 (3.976-15.028) Watt
发言人MacBook Air 15 的扬声器系统再次表现出色，与较小的 MacBook Air 13 相比也略胜一筹。 MacBook Air 13.
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.8% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (7.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.3% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)Compared to same class» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)Compared to same class» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量与前代机型相比，功耗数据并无太大变化，也不会出现意外。在压力测试中，35 瓦的 PSU 会在几秒钟内限制功耗，但很快就会降到 30.5 瓦左右。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.17 / 0.31 WattIdle 2.2 / 11.7 / 11.8 Watt
Load
36.2 / 37.4 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Apple MacBook Air 15 M5M5 10-Core, M5 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3"Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core, M4 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3"Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeCore Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB, IPS, 2496x1664, 15"Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionCore Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3"Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteSD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ, IPS, 2496x1664, 15"Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"Average Apple M5 10-Core GPU Average of class Subnotebook Power Consumption-2%-48%-21%-33%-27%11%-17%Idle Minimum * (Watt)2.22.2 -0%3.2 -45%2.4 -9%3 -36%4.2 -91%2.09 ?(1.97 - 2.2, n=3) 5%3.78 ?(1.3 - 9.1, n=62, last 2 years) -72%Idle Average * (Watt)11.711.5 2%8.7 26%3.9 67%8.3 29%5.6 52%8.77 ?(3.01 - 11.7, n=3) 25%6.6 ?(2.5 - 11.7, n=62, last 2 years) 44%Idle Maximum * (Watt)11.811.6 2%9 24%5.1 57%8.4 29%7.8 34%8.85 ?(3.05 - 11.8, n=3) 25%7.93 ?(4.1 - 15.1, n=62, last 2 years) 33%Load Average * (Watt)36.234.5 5%44.7 -23%42.5 -17%34.3 5%28.3 22%31.1 ?(5.99 - 51.1, n=3) 14%41.8 ?(13.8 - 77.9, n=61, last 2 years) -15%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)21.726.2 -21%49.3 -127%40.2 -85%41 -89%38.2 -76%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt)23.524.4 -4%51.1 -117%43.5 -85%45.8 -95%38.8 -65%Load Maximum * (Watt)37.437.5 -0%64.6 -73%64.4 -72%65.2 -74%61.9 -66%43.5 ?(21.7 - 71.5, n=3) -16%64.7 ?(26.3 - 105.1, n=62, last 2 years) -73%* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
Apple MacBook Air 15 M5; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø34.5 (29.6-37.4) WattApple MacBook Air 15 M5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.7 (4.66-4.78) WattApple MacBook Air 15 M5; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø23.5 (23.2-24) Watt
外部显示器功耗
Apple MacBook Air 15 M5; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.05 (2.93-3.26) WattApple MacBook Air 15 M5; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø21.7 (21.2-22.2) Watt
电池寿命在 150 尼特的 Wi-Fi 测试中，M4 型号的电池续航时间为 17.2 小时，略高于 M4 型号的 16.5 小时。不过，最大亮度下的续航时间基本相同，均为 6.7 小时。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
17h 12min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
6h 44min
Battery Runtime
WiFi WebsurfingMicrosoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeCore Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V, 64 Wh
17.7 h +3%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionCore Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 80 Wh
17.5 h +2%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5M5 10-Core, M5 10-Core GPU, 66.5 Wh
17.2 h Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core, M4 10-Core GPU, 66.5 Wh
16.5 h -4%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteSD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 64 Wh
14.8 h -14%Average of class Subnotebook (7.25 - 26.4, n=63, last 2 years)
14 h -19%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 61.8 Wh
7.4 h -57% WiFi Websurfing max. BrightnessLenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionCore Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 80 Wh
9.5 h +42%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeCore Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V, 64 Wh
8.8 h +31%Average of class Subnotebook (4.82 - 15.8, n=34, last 2 years)
8.62 h +29%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4M4 10-Core, M4 10-Core GPU, 66.5 Wh
6.8 h +1%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5M5 10-Core, M5 10-Core GPU, 66.5 Wh
6.7 h Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 61.8 Wh
5.6 h -16%
笔记本检查评级
Back to the verdict
Apple MacBook Air 15 M5
- 03/08/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Chassis88 / 98 → 90%
Keyboard91%
Pointing Device99%
Connectivity72 / 74 → 98%
Weight69 / 20-77 → 86%
Battery91%
Display83%
Games Performance54 / 75 → 72%
Application Performance98 / 92 → 100%
AI Performance94%
Temperature89%
Noise100%
Audio92 / 91 → 100%
Camera48 / 75 → 64%
Average78%
92%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions78.5%Materials50%Packaging100%Power Use90.4%Repairability40%Software Updates50% Total Sustainability Score: 68.1%
潜在竞争对手比较
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightHeightDisplay
1.91.6%Apple MacBook Air 15 M5Apple M5 10-Core ⎘ Apple M5 10-Core GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSDAmazon: 1.5 kg11.5 mm15.30"2880x1864224 PPIIPS
2.91.2%Apple MacBook Air 15 M4Apple M4 10-Core ⎘ Apple M4 10-core GPU ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: List Price: 1999€1.5 kg11.5 mm15.30"2880x1864224 PPIIPS
3.87.4%Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeIntel Core Ultra 7 268V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: List Price: 2760€1.7 kg18.3 mm15.00"2496x1664200 PPIIPS
4.90.1%Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionIntel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: List Price: 1989€1.4 kg17.7 mm15.30"2880x1800222 PPIOLED
5.84.3%Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘16 GB Memory, 256 GB SSDAmazon: List Price: 1100 USD1.7 kg18.29 mm15.00"2496x1664200 PPIIPS
6.80.2%Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.xAmazon: 1. $599.00Samsung Galaxy Book4 2024 Bu...2. $849.99Samsung Galaxy Book4 Laptop ...3. $1,814.00Samsung 16” Galaxy Book5 P...List Price: 1799€1.5 kg12.3 mm16.00"2880x1800212 PPIOLED
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
More articles related to this deviceApple MacBook Air 15 M5 (MacBook Air 15 M5 Series)News•Apple MacBook Neo 成为亚马逊第二大最畅销笔记本电脑，MacBook Air 13 M5 占据第一位 |News•Apple 如何改进 MacBook Air 15 英寸？我们有一些想法 |News•AppleMacBook Air 15 M5 能以超过 30 帧/秒的速度播放《刺客信条：阴影》（Assassin's Creed Shadows |News•主要缺点 Apple MacBook Neo 电池寿命因过度削减成本而受到影响 Related Articles
Apple 如何改进 MacBook Air 15 英寸？我们有一些想法
03/21/2026
AppleMacBook Air 15 M5 能以超过 30 帧/秒的速度播放《刺客信条：阴影》（Assassin's Creed Shadows
03/12/2026
AppleMacBook Air 13 的入门级 M5 SoC 在《赛博朋克 2077》或《博德之门 3》等游戏中的功耗仅为 7-8 瓦特。
03/08/2026
无风扇的超凡性能和效率 -Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 入门机型评测
03/07/2026
Apple 更新 MacBook Air，配备 M5 SoC、双倍基本存储空间和 WiFi 7
03/04/2026
Apple M5 SoC 分析：Apple 芯片扩大了对 AMD、英特尔和高通的领先优势
10/23/2025
Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 2135 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013contact me via: LinkedInTranslator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 783185 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via: